In recent years, I have been privileged to conduct security assessments for multiple school districts. Part of my job includes physically inspecting security measures already in place. Physical security elements play a significant role in protecting our students against a wide range of threats, including bomb threats.
In addition to physical security measures, a school's policies and procedures help protect students and staff by ensuring a plan is in place for all threats. It's important to remember that bomb threats can occur anytime, so schools must always be prepared. The three most common types of bomb threats directed toward schools are phone calls, written correspondence, and suspicious packages.
This blog will address the three types of bomb threats, outline the crucial role of each individual in responding to the threat, and discuss the importance of training school personnel and implementing comprehensive policies and procedures to address bomb threats.
Phone Threat— This is the most common bomb threat directed toward schools. Bomb threats received over the phone are taken seriously until proven otherwise. If a bomb threat is received, whether from a person making the call or by a robocall, the response should include the following:
The call taker’s primary responsibilities include remaining calm and cooperating with the caller. The call taker should not hang up the phone but should instead try to prolong the conversation to identify background noises or discrepancies in the caller's statements, such as mispronouncing school or town names.
Written Correspondence—Written bomb threats can take various forms, such as handwritten notes, emails, or social media messages, and can be anonymous. When responding, it's crucial to treat the message as a real threat until proven otherwise.
Suspicious Package—A suspicious package is any item potentially containing explosives, an IED, or any other hazardous materials that requires a response from a bomb technician. This differs from an unattended package that is not accounted for and shows no apparent signs of being suspicious.
Training staff on how to respond to a bomb threat is the first step toward a swift and successful response. School staff should work with local law enforcement authorities to determine protocols for evaluating bomb threats, as well as shelter-in-place and evacuation procedures. Training should occur at least once per school semester to ensure all staff have the latest information.
Comprehensive policies and procedures for handling a bomb threat, including identifying reunification and media staging areas, are essential. Develop procedures for conducting evacuations (short and distant), alternative sites, transportation procedures, and reunification with families.
School support employees such as bus drivers, custodians, and secretaries, who are likely to encounter bomb threats, should be included in training. Bus personnel should also clearly understand their role in a distant evacuation situation, including the location of evacuation and reunification sites.
Establish a clear communication plan. Maintain communication between school officials and parents and school officials and first responders. Ensure a well-developed crisis communication and social media plan is in place to provide accurate information to parents, the media, staff, and students.
No one-size-fits-all solution exists to entirely prevent security threats to our schools. It is important to understand the different types of bomb threats and risks they pose to our schools so we can work together to mitigate them. Knowing what to do immediately when a bomb threat is discovered can ensure a safe outcome for everyone involved. Bomb threat response is a team effort, and with proper knowledge, training, and support, we can ensure the safety of our schools.